| |
G0MFW > SURVEY 15.02.06 09:05z 40 Lines 1882 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 033126G0MFW
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: HTML on packet
Path: SR1BSZ<SP7MGD<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<F6KMO<EA5DVS<ED1ZAC<GB7YKS<GB7NND
Sent: 060215/0855Z @:GB7NND.#23.GBR.EU #:49466 [Worksop, Notts] $:033126G0MFW
From: G0MFW@GB7NND.#23.GBR.EU
To : SURVEY@WW
[T:0854. D:15/02/06 #:3126 N:Bill B:GB7NND {IO93QL, Kirton-in-Lindsey}]
Did you know that? The "sixth sick sheik's sixth sheep's sick" is said
to be the toughest tongue twister in the English language.
George G1NNB wrote in a bulletin as follows:-
> Whilst it is fairly simple to check if there is only a line or two of HTML at
> the start of a bulltin it's a different matter when the text of the message is
> swamped in HTML it is not.
I agree with you on that George, it is. Of the HTM bulletins I've seen
today one comprised of 55 lines, this included blank lines and headers
etc. The rest was all HTM with ONLY 9 lines of meaningful text.
> Like a lot of things on this mode if it's used sensible it's OK but many years
> of experience tells me that this will not happen because the idiot element
> will always try to out do each other thus bloating out bulletins with miles of
> HTML code. The idiots killed it last time and they will kill it again when
> ever it's tried.
Again I agree with George, if it is used SENSIBLY. But from past
experience it will be as George stated. If it comes I'll have to live
with it and hope it IS used sensibly but I somehow doubt it. Regards
and....
ÜÛÛÛÛÞ
ÚßÛÛÛÛÛÞ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿
ÚÄÄÄÙ ÜÜÛÛÜ_ÜÜÜ Û] ±± ³ ....73, de Bill ³
²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²² ±±þ ³ G0MFW @ GB7NND.#23.GBR.EU ³
³ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ³ ÚÙ ³ WinPack V6.80 Registered. ³
³ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ³ ±±±±±Ù ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ
ÃÄÄÒÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÒÄÄÙ Ûþ\ Timed 08:53 GMT 15-Feb-2006
ß Ð Ð OßOßO (c)
Famous Last Words: What you don't know, can't hurt you.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |