| |
UT1HZM > JNOS 26.04.25 16:39z 40 Lines 1076 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 33876_UT1HZM
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Those 'useless' headers
Path: SR1BSZ<SR4BBX<DB0RES<DB0ERF<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ<LU1DBQ<LU9DCE<VE3TOK<VE3CGR<
WG0A<N2MH4<N3HYM<IW2OHX<UT1HZM
Sent: 250426/1620Z 33876@UT1HZM.KREM.POL.UKR.EU BPQ6.0.24
Hello, Maiko
good to see you are still active on packet :)
I'm talked about lines like:
--->From kj6fqpS6fqp.w6tj.#sca.ca.usa.noam@kq6up.ampr.org Sat Apr 26 08:09:42 2025
---Received: from kq6up.ampr.org by kq6up.ampr.org (JNOS2.0o.2) with SMTP
--- id AA64102 ; Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:09:42 PDT
---Message-Id: <SVBZB5KJ6FQP@kj6fqp.bbs>
--->From: kj6fqp@kj6fqp.w6tj.#sca.ca.usa.noam
---X-JNOS-User-Port: Circuit (GTNODE:KQ6UP-5 KQ6UP-5) -> Sending message
Looks like most of JNOS-originated messages seen in bulls have it for last decade or so.
Before that time, if my memory recalls right, most of jnos 1.x originated messages don't had that.
BTW your message looks as "good old jnos" and don't have that:
---R:250426/1333z @:VE4KLM.#WPG.MB.CAN.NOAM [Winnipeg] $:C185S_VE4KLM
---
---I have not added or removed from these so called 'useless' headers
And even not have classic BBS-header of "From: ... To: ..." , for example:
---From: KJ6FQP @ KJ6FQP.W6TJ.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM (Assunta)
---To: JNOS @ WW
Not a big problem thought, just for info.
73, Sergej.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |